guyfromsg
04-29 11:42 AM
I was in a similar situation. I emailed to this address info@phi.dflc.us from my company email. I didn't put anything else ( as per advice in some other forums). Received reply with the case number after a month. Meanwhile I received 45 days letter and so not worried much. As we all know this is a hit and miss. They may reply..but won't hurt to try.
Sub: Case status
Company Name:
First name:
Last name:
Sub: Case status
Company Name:
First name:
Last name:
wallpaper 1 minute comedic monologues
Caliber
05-11 12:55 PM
My I-485 is pending and priority date is OCT 2006. We have EAD which expires in DEC 2010. I also have H1B visa which expires on JUN 2010 (After 3 years of extension after I-140 approval.) My question is:
1. Is it worth having H1B visa extended just in-case? Will extending H1B visa cause any problems with pending I-485?
I appriciate yr help.
Thanks
Jig.
Is it worth having H1B visa extended just in-case? -- Worth only in case some thing happens to 485
Will extending H1B visa cause any problems with pending I-485? -- No
Request you to please contribute and become Donor.
1. Is it worth having H1B visa extended just in-case? Will extending H1B visa cause any problems with pending I-485?
I appriciate yr help.
Thanks
Jig.
Is it worth having H1B visa extended just in-case? -- Worth only in case some thing happens to 485
Will extending H1B visa cause any problems with pending I-485? -- No
Request you to please contribute and become Donor.
peer123
12-15 08:42 AM
Your thoughts!
2011 comedic monologues Todd
vivekm1309
08-02 01:51 PM
Please close the thread if it is non sence.
Just thaugt to have a idea about how many people have missed this opprtunity.
MY PD is EB2 June 7 2006.
MC
This seems like a filibuster thread :p Our folks seem to be learning fast from folks like Senator King & Senator Sessions :D
Just thaugt to have a idea about how many people have missed this opprtunity.
MY PD is EB2 June 7 2006.
MC
This seems like a filibuster thread :p Our folks seem to be learning fast from folks like Senator King & Senator Sessions :D
more...
WaitingUnlimited
03-24 03:55 AM
This is old posting. Discussion on this video is happening from few days.;)
GC_Q
04-18 10:43 AM
Hello Gurus,
I have got my wife passport stamped(H4) until Oct'09 based on my previous H1. I have changed company and got new I-797 for both of us valid till Apr'2010. During her recent visit to India and return to USA, at the port of entry she was issued I-94 till Oct'2009 eventhough her I-797 form my new employer is valid till Feb'2010.
I don't want to ask my wife to cross the broder (@Mexico or @Canada) for the sake of renewing her I-94. I am wondering if I can apply with USCIS for her extension of I-94 till April'2010 for which she has I-797 to support it.
Thanks
I have got my wife passport stamped(H4) until Oct'09 based on my previous H1. I have changed company and got new I-797 for both of us valid till Apr'2010. During her recent visit to India and return to USA, at the port of entry she was issued I-94 till Oct'2009 eventhough her I-797 form my new employer is valid till Feb'2010.
I don't want to ask my wife to cross the broder (@Mexico or @Canada) for the sake of renewing her I-94. I am wondering if I can apply with USCIS for her extension of I-94 till April'2010 for which she has I-797 to support it.
Thanks
more...
malet
06-02 10:33 AM
Hello, I'm new to this forum. Please don't be tough on me.
I received the folowing letter from NVC. The case is for my dad. He originally filed under F4, priority date 13Jul2000.
What does it mean and what we should do?
Many thanks.
===========================================
Dear Sir/Madam:
Your inquiry has been received at the National Visa Center (NVC).
A letter was previously mailed to the Agent of Choice or Attorney of
Record requesting the amendment of previously submitted applicant forms
and/or required applicant documents that have not been submitted. The
documents listed on the letter and/or the amended forms must be
submitted to the assigned US Embassy or Consulate General at the time of
interview.
The applicant's name has been placed on the list of documentarily
qualified cases awaiting the availability of visa numbers under the
numerical limitations prescribed by statute. The designated
representative of this case (applicant, petitioner, or attorney) will be
notified of an appointment date as soon as the numbers have been
received. The applicant should NOT make any travel arrangements, sell
property, or give up employment until the US Embassy or Consulate
General has issued a visa.
An immigrant visa is usually valid for six months from the date it is
issued. It may be used to apply for admission into the United States any
time during its validity.
I received the folowing letter from NVC. The case is for my dad. He originally filed under F4, priority date 13Jul2000.
What does it mean and what we should do?
Many thanks.
===========================================
Dear Sir/Madam:
Your inquiry has been received at the National Visa Center (NVC).
A letter was previously mailed to the Agent of Choice or Attorney of
Record requesting the amendment of previously submitted applicant forms
and/or required applicant documents that have not been submitted. The
documents listed on the letter and/or the amended forms must be
submitted to the assigned US Embassy or Consulate General at the time of
interview.
The applicant's name has been placed on the list of documentarily
qualified cases awaiting the availability of visa numbers under the
numerical limitations prescribed by statute. The designated
representative of this case (applicant, petitioner, or attorney) will be
notified of an appointment date as soon as the numbers have been
received. The applicant should NOT make any travel arrangements, sell
property, or give up employment until the US Embassy or Consulate
General has issued a visa.
An immigrant visa is usually valid for six months from the date it is
issued. It may be used to apply for admission into the United States any
time during its validity.
2010 monologue
Abhishika
09-22 05:20 PM
thank u all. I will ask them to give a copy to apply for SSN
more...
thesparky007
04-01 12:42 AM
^pwnage!!
hair disney male comedic monologues
Lasantha
12-24 06:18 PM
Thanks perm2gc for clearing that up for me. So they DO kinda tell you if you've been Naughty or Nice, hmm? :D
more...
alisa
02-11 12:34 AM
I know its pretty cold here in Wisconsin these days, but come on!!!!
Speak up.....Say something...Somebody...Please....
The silence is deafening!!!!!!
Hello from Wisconsin......
We tried to organize a little meeting back in December. But not much came out of it.
We should try again.
Speak up.....Say something...Somebody...Please....
The silence is deafening!!!!!!
Hello from Wisconsin......
We tried to organize a little meeting back in December. But not much came out of it.
We should try again.
hot Online Comedic Monologues
![funny monologue. [1 2 minute comedic monologue]](http://blog.foodnetwork.com/healthyeats/files/2010/09/Herb-Mesa-Chicken-Wrap-Recipe.jpg "[1 2 minute comedic monologue]")
EkAurAaya
05-25 12:47 PM
Guys as the administrator (pappu) pointed out... we really need to be short and sweet and to the point... mixing issues will only create confusion and we will all look unorganized...
***admin's I used your template but tried to add some more personal touch to express what we all are dealing with, hope it's ok:
When you call stick to something as simple as:
My name is ____ and I am calling from [city], in the state of [State]. I am a member of a group called Immigration Voice – that represents LEGAL skilled immigrants.
I've been patiently waiting for ___ Years for my green card now, I came here legally and have always followed all laws of this land... I'm really disappointed and disheartened by what I see and read about the immigration reform bill.
All I ask is... (discuss all 3 issues or even 1 that you think will keep it simple and get your point across)
1) INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants who are currently backlogged. We request the Senate to ELIMINATE the backlogs BEFORE starting a new merits based system.
2) Urge the Senator to AMEND section 501(b) and INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants from 140,000 to a higher number to ELIMINATE the current backlogs, the SAME way the bill REDUCES backlogs for family-based immigrants in section 501(a).
3) Oppose the senate’s immigration bill in its current form because it reduces the number of green cards for legal skilled immigrants. It diverts these green cards to the proposed future guest worker program and to a proposed untested merits based system.
***admin's I used your template but tried to add some more personal touch to express what we all are dealing with, hope it's ok:
When you call stick to something as simple as:
My name is ____ and I am calling from [city], in the state of [State]. I am a member of a group called Immigration Voice – that represents LEGAL skilled immigrants.
I've been patiently waiting for ___ Years for my green card now, I came here legally and have always followed all laws of this land... I'm really disappointed and disheartened by what I see and read about the immigration reform bill.
All I ask is... (discuss all 3 issues or even 1 that you think will keep it simple and get your point across)
1) INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants who are currently backlogged. We request the Senate to ELIMINATE the backlogs BEFORE starting a new merits based system.
2) Urge the Senator to AMEND section 501(b) and INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants from 140,000 to a higher number to ELIMINATE the current backlogs, the SAME way the bill REDUCES backlogs for family-based immigrants in section 501(a).
3) Oppose the senate’s immigration bill in its current form because it reduces the number of green cards for legal skilled immigrants. It diverts these green cards to the proposed future guest worker program and to a proposed untested merits based system.
more...
house Comedic Monologue
dixie
03-13 11:44 PM
There are two sides to the issue : strengthening the domestic workforce through education, research investment etc and then there is skilled immigration. The first half no doubt enjoys unanimous support ... however, when it comes to promoting skilled immigration, it is a pretty safe bet that the anti-immigrant lobby is going to play hard ball (already evident from the SF gate article). Overcoming this lobby is the whole challenge ..
tattoo six minute comedic monologues
lonedesi
03-05 07:37 AM
Thank you msp1976 for your response.
more...
pictures comedic monologues black
sdudeja
04-18 10:45 PM
I found out that it was RFE to get me credentials evaluations and copies of degrees. My employer has already sent those. Thanks for the response though.
dresses [1 2 minute comedic monologue]
sac-r-ten
03-03 10:37 AM
thats very sad and bad on part of the HR. should always use fedEX, UPS for tracking such imp docs. anyways you can use Form I-824 Application for Duplicate Approval Notice.
google it and it should take around 3-5 months. friend of mine lost it at the photocopier and had to take this route.
good luck.
google it and it should take around 3-5 months. friend of mine lost it at the photocopier and had to take this route.
good luck.
more...
makeup His funny monologue was based
deafTunes123
10-15 01:03 PM
October 13, 2008 (Computerworld) A recent review of 246 H-1B visa applications by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) found that 21% contained fraudulent information or "technical violations" of federal laws and regulations.
The violation rate was even higher in cases involving computer professionals. Twenty-eight of the 104 that were examined, or 27%, had violations of some sort, according to a USCIS report that was finalized in September and publicly released last week by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).
USCIS investigators examined a random sample of the nearly 97,000 H-1B petitions filed in late 2005 and early 2006. They found problems such as forged signatures, fake degrees and the use of shell companies in applications. Other issues were discovered during visits to work sites. For instance, some employers "benched" H-1B holders when work wasn't available or had them doing jobs that weren't listed on their visa applications, the report said.
Fraud indicators
* Businesses with 25 or fewer employees and revenue of less than $10 million had higher rates of H-1B fraud than larger companies did, the USCIS said.
* Of 114 cases involving workers from India, 25% were found to involve fraud or technical violations. No other countries had statistically valid samples.
The report's authors called the level of fraud a "significant vulnerability" for the H-1B program and wrote that the USCIS is making "procedural changes" in response to the findings. An agency spokesman said Friday that possible steps include checking applications against external records and using fraud indicators to flag petitions for increased scrutiny.
Source::
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Legislation%2FRegulation&articleId=327957&taxonomyId=70
The violation rate was even higher in cases involving computer professionals. Twenty-eight of the 104 that were examined, or 27%, had violations of some sort, according to a USCIS report that was finalized in September and publicly released last week by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).
USCIS investigators examined a random sample of the nearly 97,000 H-1B petitions filed in late 2005 and early 2006. They found problems such as forged signatures, fake degrees and the use of shell companies in applications. Other issues were discovered during visits to work sites. For instance, some employers "benched" H-1B holders when work wasn't available or had them doing jobs that weren't listed on their visa applications, the report said.
Fraud indicators
* Businesses with 25 or fewer employees and revenue of less than $10 million had higher rates of H-1B fraud than larger companies did, the USCIS said.
* Of 114 cases involving workers from India, 25% were found to involve fraud or technical violations. No other countries had statistically valid samples.
The report's authors called the level of fraud a "significant vulnerability" for the H-1B program and wrote that the USCIS is making "procedural changes" in response to the findings. An agency spokesman said Friday that possible steps include checking applications against external records and using fraud indicators to flag petitions for increased scrutiny.
Source::
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Legislation%2FRegulation&articleId=327957&taxonomyId=70
girlfriend minute comedic monologues
InTheMoment
07-28 01:49 PM
phew !
Receipt Date is the date they receive your application
Notice Date is the date they generate the receipt
We are interested in the former (so it happens to be July 2nd in your case)
Wait for your receipt and confirm that the "Receipt Date" printed on your receipt is July 2 (99% of the cases have the date CIS physically received the package)
sorry for my ignorance.. But is that again July 2nd (receipt date on my application) or date they issue me Receipt #?
Receipt Date is the date they receive your application
Notice Date is the date they generate the receipt
We are interested in the former (so it happens to be July 2nd in your case)
Wait for your receipt and confirm that the "Receipt Date" printed on your receipt is July 2 (99% of the cases have the date CIS physically received the package)
sorry for my ignorance.. But is that again July 2nd (receipt date on my application) or date they issue me Receipt #?
hairstyles COMEDIC MONOLOGUES - Page 3
chanduv23
09-16 01:04 PM
You can always cheer them - but just one day at DC will help change your lives
India_USA
09-09 08:15 AM
Isn't this the same argument one of the members said regarding the 500 visas not allocated to EB3 India last year?
guyfromsg
08-14 09:03 PM
I live in NJ and my application was recieved on July 2nd. would that be Nebraska or Texas SC?
NJ comes under TSC but direct filing took effect only from July 30th. Till then the 485 was supposed to be sent to the center where 140 is filed or to NSC ( if no 140 filed). Even if it was sent to the wrong center USCIS will not reject the application in this timeframe. It will be internally transferred to the the correct service center.
NJ comes under TSC but direct filing took effect only from July 30th. Till then the 485 was supposed to be sent to the center where 140 is filed or to NSC ( if no 140 filed). Even if it was sent to the wrong center USCIS will not reject the application in this timeframe. It will be internally transferred to the the correct service center.
No comments:
Post a Comment